This year marks the 1700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea, which represents a turning point in Christian history. The event was so far-reaching that some divide Christian history into pre- and post-Nicene periods. The Council of Nicaea is known for establishing Christian orthodoxy: we are talking about “Nicene orthodoxy” or the theology of the Holy Trinity, which actually began to develop with this council and continued to evolve in the following centuries. Many celebrate the Council of Nicaea as an important achievement, especially with regards to Christian unity. I agree it is good that Arianism, which the council opposed, did not become the dominant form of Christianity. However, the way in which this was prevented leaves a bitter aftertaste, making it difficult for me to join in the enthusiastic celebrations. In this article, I would like to present a second opinion, which attempts to be historically balanced and also points out the negative aspects of this council.
Nadaljuj z branjem “Council of Nicaea: Second Opinion”Oznaka: church and state
1600 Years of Church’s Slavery
The body of Christ, the church, the people of God, has been trapped for 1600 years (40 × 40) in the schemes and structures of the powers and principalities of this world. Not only externally, in terms of cooperating with them, receiving benefits, subsidies and privileges, spreading the gospel by force, etc., but also internally, in terms of the internal dynamics of worship and community order. Patterns, structures and forms of authority in external society have influenced the understanding of authority within the Christian community and, consequently, its internal functioning. This process began as early as the 2nd century, and was sealed and finally established by 313 AD, when Christianity became the favoured (and soon afterwards the only permitted) religion of the Roman Empire. Following the pattern of human powers and religions, a separation between clergy and laity (even if it is not called that!) has developed within the body of Christ, which in practice means that most of the bodily functions are taken over by a small group of leaders, while the other members are passive, atrophied, moribund. And the leaders tend to get burned out – especially if they are conscientious in their work. Instead of a body where every member contributes (1Co 12:6–7; 14:26; Eph 4:16) and co-labours, we have a kind of association where the majority is inactive and where the leaders often dominate according to the pattern of the worldly authority and power (Mk 10:42). It is a gathering modelled by the imperial civil service, quite bureaucratic, rather than a sanctuary of the body of Christ where the Spirit works powerfully and effectively through every member; a body that spreads and grows in small holy communities (Mt 18:18–20) throughout the whole world (Mt 28:18–20; Col 1:6).
Nadaljuj z branjem “1600 Years of Church’s Slavery”